From Prompting to Agent Engineering
Prompting matters, but it is only one control layer. Reliable agents come from designing the loop, validating tool use, tracing decisions, and treating runtime behavior as the real unit of quality.
Prompting matters, but it is only one control layer. Reliable agents come from designing the loop, validating tool use, tracing decisions, and treating runtime behavior as the real unit of quality.
AI agents usually do not fail with a dramatic crash. They fail quietly through wrong tool calls, invalid arguments, retry storms, looping behavior, and weak recovery. This article explains where the agent loop breaks and how to design traces, guardrails, limits, checkpointing, idempotency, and evals that catch incidents before users do.
Most teams think they are choosing a framework. In practice, they are choosing what they will be able to see, control, and recover when an agent fails. This article explains the execution layer, orchestration layer, state tradeoffs, and the real architectural decisions behind a modern agent stack.
Learn how to design an eval set for a tool-using agent using trace-level evaluation, dataset splits, layered scoring, and realistic failure cases that catch regressions before production.
Prompting can improve a single run, but it cannot prove that an agent workflow is reliable. This article explains how traces, scorecards, offline evals, and online monitoring turn agent quality into an engineering discipline.
If an agent fails and you only have the final answer, you are debugging blind. This article explains how useful traces expose the exact step, tool, state, or context failure that actually broke the run.
Reliable agents are not the ones that never fail. They are the ones that fail into the right path. Here is how to classify tool failures into retry, replan, user input, or hard stop, and why retry policy belongs at the tool boundary.
Most bad agent experiences come from bad stopping decisions. Learn how to design stop logic in code with explicit exit states, tool signals, step limits, and traceable runtime policies.
Tool use is where an agent stops generating text and starts affecting real systems. This article explains why tool design acts as both decision boundary and action contract, and how better schemas, validation, and tracing make tool calling agents more reliable.
Most agent failures are not prompt failures. They happen because teams misunderstand the control loop the system is actually running. This article breaks the loop into its real runtime parts and shows why that changes debugging, reliability, and production behavior.
We use cookies to improve your experience on our site. By using our site, you consent to cookies.
Manage your cookie preferences below:
Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the proper function of the website.
These cookies are needed for adding comments on this website.
Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us understand how visitors use our website.
Google Analytics is a powerful tool that tracks and analyzes website traffic for informed marketing decisions.
Service URL: policies.google.com (opens in a new window)